Migrating from Monocle

Monocle is a mature, elegant optics library and the reference point for optics on Scala. If it is serving you well, there is no urgency to move. This page is for the cases where you want what cats-eo optimises for — and a map of what changes (and what doesn't) when you do.

Why migrate?

cats-eo and Monocle care about different things. Monocle's design prizes a clean, minimal core: eight classic optics related by an inheritance hierarchy, so the library reads as beautifully as the code you write with it. cats-eo is built for performance and industrial application, and it accepts internal complexity to get there. The library's own source is not the most elegant code you will ever read — existential carriers, fused composition overloads, opaque types, hand-tuned array machines — but every one of those choices buys something at your call site:

• Efficiency. Optic operations compile down to plain function composition wherever possible. The fused inline composers mean a deeply composed optic dispatches like hand-written code instead of a chain of allocated closures — on the benchmarks, composed getters and modifies run ~2× faster than the equivalent Monocle composition at depth 6, and each-style traversals reach ~3× on realistic collection sizes (Monocle wins some single-hop cells; the gap is a composition-depth story). When an optic sits on a hot path, this is the difference that pays for the migration.
• Stack safety. Deep or degenerate structures are a fact of industrial data — a 100k-deep JSON spine, a recursive ADT from a parser. cats-eo's recursive machinery (Plated, the recursion schemes) runs on heap-backed machines and is safe at depths where simple recursion overflows.
• Interoperability. The same Lens / Prism / Traversal vocabulary you use on case classes extends to wire formats: circe Json ASTs, Apache Avro records, and raw jsoniter byte buffers — read and edit encoded data without a decode/re-encode round trip. The Monocle ecosystem prefers to leave format-specific tooling to the formats themselves; cats-eo treats it as part of the optics story.
• Compositional reach. Every family composes with every other family through one .andThen, and the result is compiler-pinned: an 11-family composition matrix asserts every pair either composes (without type ascriptions or imports) or fails to compile by design. The family space itself is larger: standalone read-only, build-only, and write-only citizens (AffineFold, Review, Unfold, Modify), multi-focus shapes (Grate, Kaleidoscope, algebraic lenses), and recursion schemes (cata / ana / hylo) that are optics and drop into the same pipelines.

The trade is real in both directions: Monocle gives you a smaller, smoother surface; cats-eo gives you throughput, depth, and reach.

What stays the same

Your day-to-day vocabulary ports almost verbatim — get, replace, modify, foldMap, getOption, reverseGet, and .andThen composition all read the same. GenLens[S](_.field) becomes lens[S](_.field) (from dev.constructive.eo.generics), and Monocle's polymorphic PLens / PPrism / PIso shapes map onto eo's pLens / polymorphic constructors one-for-one.

Law testing ports directly too. Monocle ships monocle-law with discipline rule-sets; cats-eo-laws follows the exact same checkAll pattern, so your test setup is an import swap:

libraryDependencies += "dev.constructive" %% "cats-eo-laws" % "0.1" % Test

// before: import monocle.law.discipline.LensTests
import dev.constructive.eo.laws.discipline.LensTests

checkAll("Lens[Person, Int]", LensTests[Person, Int](ageL).lens)

Every public optic family has a matching FooLaws / FooTests pair, including the families Monocle prefers not to ship (AffineFold, Review, Unfold, Modify, MultiFocus).

Where eo differs at the call site

Bring your own optic

Both libraries give you one .andThen across families, so that is not the difference. Monocle composes through its inheritance hierarchy: every optic is a weaker optic, so composition meets at the common ancestor — an elegant design, and it works because the hierarchy is closed and known up front. cats-eo chose not to have an extension hierarchy at all, and that is what changes in practice: composition is driven by typeclass instances over the carrier (AssociativeFunctor[F, X, Y] for a shared carrier, a summoned Morph[F, G] / Composer[F, G] across carriers), not by where a family sits in a subtype tree.

The payoff is for optics that come from outside the shipped families. A custom optic needs no blessed place in any hierarchy: implement the Optic trait, put the carrier instances in scope, and it composes with everything reachable through the bridges — bring your own optic. Extensibility walks through shipping a domain-tuned optic end to end. The same machinery is what makes the stock families compose:

import dev.constructive.eo.data.Affine
import dev.constructive.eo.optics.Lens
import dev.constructive.eo.optics.Optional

case class MigConfig(timeout: Option[Int])
case class MigApp(config: MigConfig)

val timeoutOpt = Optional[MigConfig, MigConfig, Int, Int, Affine](
  getOrModify = c => c.timeout.toRight(c),
  reverseGet  = { case (c, t) => c.copy(timeout = Some(t)) },
)

val appConfig =
  Lens[MigApp, MigConfig](_.config, (a, c) => a.copy(config = c))

// Cross-carrier `.andThen` lifts the Lens into the Optional's
// carrier automatically via `Composer[Tuple2, Affine]`.
val appTimeout = appConfig.andThen(timeoutOpt)

Composition is carrier-level (one Composer per pair of carriers), not family-level — so a new family, yours or ours, supplies carrier instances and inherits the cross-family bridges for free.

The one-way side, built out in both directions

Read-only collapse is common ground, not a difference: compose a chain that touches a Getter and both libraries land you on the read-only join — Monocle through its hierarchy, cats-eo through ReadCompose (lens.andThen(getter) → Getter, prism.andThen(getter) → AffineFold, traversal.andThen(getter) → Fold). Where cats-eo invests further is the write side and beyond:

• The build/write-only direction is fully populated — Modify (write-only), Review and Unfold (build-only, one focus and many) are standalone, composable citizens, with a fallible tier (writes and builds that can reject, with accumulating failures) planned next. The composition matrix pins how every pair behaves, including the cells that are void by design (getter.andThen(modify) — nothing to write through).
• A preliminary integration with recursion schemes: cats-eo is attempting to present recursion schemes as optics themselves — cata is a Getter, ana a Review, hylo a fused Getter — so that genuinely complex algorithms over trees and recursive data structures sit in the same pipeline as ordinary getters and modifiers, and the whole thing remains one optic from start to finish. The direction this is heading: an HTTP server that receives a JSON request, writes to a PostgreSQL database, and logs to an Avro-encoded Kafka topic — expressed as a single composed optic.

That ambition is why the family roster below is as large as it is.

A larger family space

Beyond the classic eight, cats-eo ships families Monocle prefers to express through other means or leave to dedicated libraries:

• AffineFold — a standalone read-only 0-or-1 focus (where Monocle reaches for Optional.getOption), with T = B = Unit so the type itself forbids writing through it.
• Review and Unfold — standalone build-only optics (Monocle expresses building through Iso.reverseGet / Prism.reverseGet). Unfold[T, B, F] (embed: F[B] => T) carries recursion-scheme algebras and aggregations as composable citizens.
• Recursion schemes as optics — Schemes.cata is a Getter, ana a Review, hylo a fused Getter, all stack-safe; they compose into ordinary optic pipelines. Monocle prefers to leave recursion schemes to dedicated libraries (droste); see Recursion schemes.
• MultiFocus shapes — Grate-style fixed-shape rewrites, Kaleidoscope aggregation, algebraic lenses; see MultiFocus.
• Full-cover macro upgrade — lens[S](_.a, _.b, ...) in one varargs call; when the selectors cover every field the result upgrades to a BijectionIso automatically (a shape Monocle prefers to leave to N hand-composed lenses).

Traversal carrier

cats-eo's Traversal.each[F, A] / pEach[F, A, B] ride the MultiFocus[PSVec] carrier — .modify, .foldMap, .modifyA, and downstream .andThen all supported. It pays a small constant factor over a hand-written map (see the PowerSeries benchmark notes) and wins it back at composition depth.

JSON, Avro, and raw bytes

circe-optics — the circe-maintained Monocle companion — gives you JsonPath optics over the Json AST, and it does that job well. cats-eo's circe integration covers the same AST territory and adds multi-field foci (fields(_.a, _.b) as a NamedTuple focus) and an observable failure channel: misses and decode failures surface as Ior values you can inspect, where JsonPath prefers the simplicity of Option (a miss and a type-mismatch read the same). From there, the same optic vocabulary extends where the Monocle ecosystem prefers not to go: Apache Avro IndexedRecords (eo-avro) and raw Array[Byte] JSON via jsoniter-scala (eo-jsoniter) — pinpoint reads and splice-writes on encoded data with no full decode/re-encode cycle.

Plated is stack-safe and composes as an optic

Monocle's monocle.function.Plated keeps its recursion simple and direct — which reads beautifully, but overflows the stack on degenerate spines (transform / universe on a deep chain; see the benchmarks). cats-eo's Plated trades that simplicity for stack safety: it clears a 100k-deep spine — transform / everywhere on a call-stack/heap-machine hybrid, the reads on a worklist, rewrite trampolined through cats.Eval. cats-eo also exposes everywhere[S] as a composable Modify — everywhere.andThen(prism).modify(f) applies an ordinary optic at every depth, a combinator Monocle's Plated chooses not to expose. See the cookbook recipe.

Cheat sheet